# Karakeep vs Koha

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Karakeep | Koha |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Bookmarks & Link Sharing | #1 of 4 in Library Management |
| GitHub stars | 30 137 ✓ | 596 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +876 ✓ | +7 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.34.1 · 22 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Perl |

## Which one should you pick?

Karakeep scores 82/100 against 61/100 for Koha, so it is the safer default.

Karakeep ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Koha.

If you want the quickest setup, Karakeep is easier to run; Koha needs more configuration.

Karakeep is growing faster right now (+876 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Karakeep](https://selfhost.directory/project/karakeep) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/karakeep.md)
- [Koha](https://selfhost.directory/project/koha) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/koha.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Karakeep vs LinkWarden](https://selfhost.directory/compare/karakeep-vs-linkwarden)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/karakeep-vs-koha