# Kanidm vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Kanidm | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in IAM | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 5 512 ✓ | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +108 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.11.2 · 11 Sept 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

Kanidm scores 67/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

Kanidm ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.

Kanidm is growing faster right now (+108 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Kanidm](https://selfhost.directory/project/kanidm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kanidm.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/kanidm-vs-windows-arm