# Kanidm vs UUSEC WAF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Kanidm | UUSEC WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in IAM | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 5 511 ✓ | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +107 ✓ | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v1.11.2 · 11 Sept 2026 | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MPL-2.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Rust | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Kanidm scores 67/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.

Kanidm ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.

If you want the quickest setup, UUSEC WAF is easier to run; Kanidm needs more configuration.

Kanidm is growing faster right now (+107 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Kanidm](https://selfhost.directory/project/kanidm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kanidm.md)
- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/kanidm-vs-uusec-waf