# Kanidm vs Upptime

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Kanidm | Upptime |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 69/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in IAM | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 5 511 | 17 183 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +107 ✓ | +-1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.11.2 · 11 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Markdown |

## Which one should you pick?

Upptime scores 69/100 against 67/100 for Kanidm, so it is the safer default.

Kanidm ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.

If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; Kanidm needs more configuration.

Kanidm is growing faster right now (+107 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Kanidm](https://selfhost.directory/project/kanidm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kanidm.md)
- [Upptime](https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/kanidm-vs-upptime