# Kanidm vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Kanidm | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in IAM | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 5 511 | 117 816 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +107 | +5 457 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.11.2 · 11 Sept 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 67/100 for Kanidm, so it is the safer default.

Kanidm ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.

If you want the quickest setup, TradingAgents is easier to run; Kanidm needs more configuration.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 457 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Kanidm](https://selfhost.directory/project/kanidm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kanidm.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/kanidm-vs-tradingagents