KanidmvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Kanidm | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in IAM | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 5 511 | 117 816 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +107 | +5 457 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.11.2 · 11 Sept 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 67/100 for Kanidm, so it is the safer default.
Kanidm ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
If you want the quickest setup, TradingAgents is easier to run; Kanidm needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 457 stars in 30 days).
Kanidm details →TradingAgents details →