# Kanidm vs tobab

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Kanidm | tobab |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 ✓ | 37/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in IAM | #34 of 40 in Authentication |
| GitHub stars | 5 512 ✓ | 155 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +106 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.11.2 · 11 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Kanidm scores 67/100 against 37/100 for tobab, so it is the safer default.

Kanidm ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for tobab.

If you want the quickest setup, tobab is easier to run; Kanidm needs more configuration.

Kanidm is growing faster right now (+106 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Kanidm](https://selfhost.directory/project/kanidm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kanidm.md)
- [tobab](https://selfhost.directory/project/tobab) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tobab.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/kanidm-vs-tobab