# Kanidm vs MQTTX Web

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Kanidm | MQTTX Web |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in IAM | #3 of 10 in IoT |
| GitHub stars | 5 511 ✓ | 5 086 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +107 ✓ | +22 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | v1.11.2 · 11 Sept 2026 | v1.13.2 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Kanidm and MQTTX Web score the same (67/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

Kanidm ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for MQTTX Web.

If you want the quickest setup, MQTTX Web is easier to run; Kanidm needs more configuration.

Kanidm is growing faster right now (+107 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Kanidm](https://selfhost.directory/project/kanidm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kanidm.md)
- [MQTTX Web](https://selfhost.directory/project/mqttx-web) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mqttx-web.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/kanidm-vs-mqttx-web