# Kanidm vs MeshCentral

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Kanidm | MeshCentral |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 74/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in IAM | #2 of 23 in Remote Access |
| GitHub stars | 5 511 | 7 528 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +107 | +250 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 16 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.11.2 · 11 Sept 2026 | 1.3.1 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

MeshCentral scores 74/100 against 67/100 for Kanidm, so it is the safer default.

MeshCentral ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for Kanidm.

If you want the quickest setup, MeshCentral is easier to run; Kanidm needs more configuration.

MeshCentral is growing faster right now (+250 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Kanidm](https://selfhost.directory/project/kanidm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kanidm.md)
- [MeshCentral](https://selfhost.directory/project/meshcentral) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/meshcentral.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/kanidm-vs-meshcentral