# JupyterLab vs uptime-kuma

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | JupyterLab | uptime-kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Data Science | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 15 380 | 93 058 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +60 | +1 264 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v4.6.5 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 78/100 for JupyterLab, so it is the safer default.

uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for JupyterLab.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 264 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [JupyterLab](https://selfhost.directory/project/jupyterlab) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/jupyterlab.md)
- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/jupyterlab-vs-uptime-kuma