JupyterLabvsApache Tika
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| JupyterLab | Apache Tika | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Data Science | #1 of 2 in Data Extraction |
| GitHub stars | 15 380 | 4 115 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +60 | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 0 |
| Latest release | v4.7.0b0 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
JupyterLab scores 78/100 against 68/100 for Apache Tika, so it is the safer default.
JupyterLab ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Apache Tika.
If you want the quickest setup, JupyterLab is easier to run; Apache Tika needs more configuration.
JupyterLab is growing faster right now (+60 stars in 30 days).
JupyterLab details →Apache Tika details →
Swap a project
Keep JupyterLab, compare it with
Keep Apache Tika, compare it with