JupyterLabvssupabase
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| JupyterLab | supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 92/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Data Science | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 15 379 | 114 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +63 | +3 551 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 8 |
| Latest release | v4.7.0b0 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 78/100 for JupyterLab, so it is the safer default.
JupyterLab ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.
If you want the quickest setup, JupyterLab is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 551 stars in 30 days).
JupyterLab details →supabase details →
Swap a project
Keep JupyterLab, compare it with
Keep supabase, compare it with