# JupyterLab vs SparkyFitness

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | JupyterLab | SparkyFitness |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Data Science | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 15 380 ✓ | 6 504 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +60 | +393 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 27 ✓ |
| Latest release | v4.7.0b0 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.10.0 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

JupyterLab scores 78/100 against 66/100 for SparkyFitness, so it is the safer default.

SparkyFitness ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for JupyterLab.

If you want the quickest setup, JupyterLab is easier to run; SparkyFitness needs more configuration.

SparkyFitness is growing faster right now (+393 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [JupyterLab](https://selfhost.directory/project/jupyterlab) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/jupyterlab.md)
- [SparkyFitness](https://selfhost.directory/project/sparkyfitness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sparkyfitness.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/jupyterlab-vs-sparkyfitness