JupyterLabvsShields
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| JupyterLab | Shields | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Data Science | #6 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 15 380 | 27 331 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +60 | +125 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 0 |
| Latest release | v4.7.0b0 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Shields scores 80/100 against 78/100 for JupyterLab, so it is the safer default.
JupyterLab ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Shields.
Shields is growing faster right now (+125 stars in 30 days).
JupyterLab details →Shields details →
Swap a project
Keep JupyterLab, compare it with
Keep Shields, compare it with