# JupyterLab vs nocodb

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | JupyterLab | nocodb |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Data Science | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms |
| GitHub stars | 15 379 | 65 375 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +59 | +313 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 15 ✓ |
| Latest release | v4.7.0b0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | 2026.10.0 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

nocodb scores 81/100 against 78/100 for JupyterLab, so it is the safer default.

nocodb ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for JupyterLab.

If you want the quickest setup, JupyterLab is easier to run; nocodb needs more configuration.

nocodb is growing faster right now (+313 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [JupyterLab](https://selfhost.directory/project/jupyterlab) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/jupyterlab.md)
- [nocodb](https://selfhost.directory/project/nocodb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nocodb.md)

## Related comparisons

- [directus vs nocodb](https://selfhost.directory/compare/directus-vs-nocodb)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/jupyterlab-vs-nocodb