jupyterhubvsPi-hole
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| jupyterhub | Pi-hole | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 30 in Collaboration | #1 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 8 359 | 61 541 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 | +497 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 6 |
| Latest release | — | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Other |
| Main language | Python | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 69/100 for jupyterhub, so it is the safer default.
Pi-hole ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for jupyterhub.
If you want the quickest setup, Pi-hole is easier to run; jupyterhub needs more configuration.
Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+497 stars in 30 days).
jupyterhub details →Pi-hole details →
Swap a project
Keep jupyterhub, compare it with
Keep Pi-hole, compare it with