# jupyterhub vs nocodb

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | jupyterhub | nocodb |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 30 in Collaboration | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms |
| GitHub stars | 8 359 | 65 375 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +18 | +313 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 15 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 2026.10.0 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Other |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

nocodb scores 81/100 against 69/100 for jupyterhub, so it is the safer default.

nocodb ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for jupyterhub.

If you want the quickest setup, nocodb is easier to run; jupyterhub needs more configuration.

nocodb is growing faster right now (+313 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [jupyterhub](https://selfhost.directory/project/jupyterhub) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/jupyterhub.md)
- [nocodb](https://selfhost.directory/project/nocodb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nocodb.md)

## Related comparisons

- [directus vs nocodb](https://selfhost.directory/compare/directus-vs-nocodb)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/jupyterhub-vs-nocodb