jupyterhubvsmultica
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| jupyterhub | multica | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 84/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 30 in Collaboration | #10 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 8 359 | 54 125 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 | +2 883 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 87 |
| Latest release | — | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Other |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
multica scores 84/100 against 69/100 for jupyterhub, so it is the safer default.
multica ships more often: 87 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for jupyterhub.
If you want the quickest setup, multica is easier to run; jupyterhub needs more configuration.
multica is growing faster right now (+2 883 stars in 30 days).
jupyterhub details →multica details →
Swap a project
Keep jupyterhub, compare it with
Keep multica, compare it with