jumpservervsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| jumpserver | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 19 in Identity & Auth | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 31 848 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +256 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 10 |
| Latest release | v3.10.24 · 27 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
jumpserver scores 77/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
jumpserver ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.
If you want the quickest setup, jumpserver is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
jumpserver is growing faster right now (+256 stars in 30 days).
jumpserver details →Windows ARM details →