jumpservervsText Generation WebUI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| jumpserver | Text Generation WebUI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 19 in Identity & Auth | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 31 852 | 47 724 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +251 | +17 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 10 |
| Latest release | v3.10.24 · 27 Oct 2026 | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
jumpserver scores 77/100 against 76/100 for Text Generation WebUI, so it is the safer default.
jumpserver ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Text Generation WebUI.
If you want the quickest setup, Text Generation WebUI is easier to run; jumpserver needs more configuration.
jumpserver is growing faster right now (+251 stars in 30 days).
jumpserver details →Text Generation WebUI details →