jumpservervsApache SkyWalking
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| jumpserver | Apache SkyWalking | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 19 in Identity & Auth | #2 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 31 856 | 24 978 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +255 | +4 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 3 |
| Latest release | v3.10.24 · 27 Oct 2026 | v11.0.0 · 28 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |
Which one should you pick?
jumpserver scores 77/100 against 76/100 for Apache SkyWalking, so it is the safer default.
jumpserver ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Apache SkyWalking.
If you want the quickest setup, jumpserver is easier to run; Apache SkyWalking needs more configuration.
jumpserver is growing faster right now (+255 stars in 30 days).
jumpserver details →Apache SkyWalking details →