jumpservervsShinobi
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| jumpserver | Shinobi | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 19 in Identity & Auth | #3 of 24 in Video Surveillance |
| GitHub stars | 31 848 | — |
| Stars, last 30 days | +256 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.10.24 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | — |
Which one should you pick?
jumpserver scores 77/100 against 66/100 for Shinobi, so it is the safer default.
jumpserver ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Shinobi.
If you want the quickest setup, jumpserver is easier to run; Shinobi needs more configuration.
jumpserver is growing faster right now (+256 stars in 30 days).
jumpserver details →Shinobi details →