# jumpserver vs SeaweedFS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | jumpserver | SeaweedFS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 19 in Identity & Auth | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 31 852 | 35 795 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +251 | +834 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 28 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.10.24 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 77/100 for jumpserver, so it is the safer default.

SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for jumpserver.

SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+834 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [jumpserver](https://selfhost.directory/project/jumpserver) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/jumpserver.md)
- [SeaweedFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/jumpserver-vs-seaweedfs