# jumpserver vs Radarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | jumpserver | Radarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 19 in Identity & Auth | #3 of 45 in Download Management |
| GitHub stars | 31 855 ✓ | 14 672 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +254 ✓ | +241 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.10.24 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v7.0.0.10815 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Radarr scores 78/100 against 77/100 for jumpserver, so it is the safer default.

Radarr ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for jumpserver.

If you want the quickest setup, Radarr is easier to run; jumpserver needs more configuration.

## Details

- [jumpserver](https://selfhost.directory/project/jumpserver) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/jumpserver.md)
- [Radarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/radarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/radarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/jumpserver-vs-radarr