# jumpserver vs pikvm

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | jumpserver | pikvm |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 19 in Identity & Auth | #3 of 23 in Remote Access |
| GitHub stars | 31 848 ✓ | 10 424 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +256 ✓ | +71 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.10.24 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | — |

## Which one should you pick?

jumpserver scores 77/100 against 72/100 for pikvm, so it is the safer default.

jumpserver ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for pikvm.

If you want the quickest setup, jumpserver is easier to run; pikvm needs more configuration.

jumpserver is growing faster right now (+256 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [jumpserver](https://selfhost.directory/project/jumpserver) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/jumpserver.md)
- [pikvm](https://selfhost.directory/project/pikvm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pikvm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/jumpserver-vs-pikvm