# jumpserver vs Pi-hole

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | jumpserver | Pi-hole |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 19 in Identity & Auth | #1 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 31 856 | 61 548 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +255 | +486 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v3.10.24 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 77/100 for jumpserver, so it is the safer default.

jumpserver ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Pi-hole.

## Details

- [jumpserver](https://selfhost.directory/project/jumpserver) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/jumpserver.md)
- [Pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/jumpserver-vs-pi-hole