jumpservervsOmniVoice-Studio
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| jumpserver | OmniVoice-Studio | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 94/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 19 in Identity & Auth | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 31 844 | 92 652 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +252 | +57 711 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 35 |
| Latest release | v3.10.24 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 77/100 for jumpserver, so it is the safer default.
OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for jumpserver.
OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+57 711 stars in 30 days).
jumpserver details →OmniVoice-Studio details →