# jumpserver vs OmniRoute

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | jumpserver | OmniRoute |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 19 in Identity & Auth | #4 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 31 844 | 82 151 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +252 | +3 135 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v3.10.24 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | radar-export-latest · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniRoute scores 88/100 against 77/100 for jumpserver, so it is the safer default.

jumpserver ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for OmniRoute.

If you want the quickest setup, OmniRoute is easier to run; jumpserver needs more configuration.

OmniRoute is growing faster right now (+3 135 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [jumpserver](https://selfhost.directory/project/jumpserver) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/jumpserver.md)
- [OmniRoute](https://selfhost.directory/project/omniroute) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omniroute.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/jumpserver-vs-omniroute