# juicefs vs Shields

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | juicefs | Shields |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in File Storage | #6 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 14 586 | 27 331 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +121 | +125 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.4.2 · 22 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

Shields scores 80/100 against 73/100 for juicefs, so it is the safer default.

juicefs ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Shields.

If you want the quickest setup, Shields is easier to run; juicefs needs more configuration.

## Details

- [juicefs](https://selfhost.directory/project/juicefs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/juicefs.md)
- [Shields](https://selfhost.directory/project/shields) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/shields.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/juicefs-vs-shields