# juice-shop vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | juice-shop | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 78 in Security | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 14 280 | 118 160 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +337 | +5 801 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v20.3.0 · 11 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 81/100 for juice-shop, so it is the safer default.

TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for juice-shop.

If you want the quickest setup, juice-shop is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 801 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [juice-shop](https://selfhost.directory/project/juice-shop) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/juice-shop.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/juice-shop-vs-tradingagents