# juice-shop vs mitmproxy

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | juice-shop | mitmproxy |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 78 in Security | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 14 270 | 46 451 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +335 | +1 316 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v20.3.0 · 11 Oct 2026 | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

mitmproxy scores 86/100 against 81/100 for juice-shop, so it is the safer default.

juice-shop ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for mitmproxy.

If you want the quickest setup, juice-shop is easier to run; mitmproxy needs more configuration.

mitmproxy is growing faster right now (+1 316 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [juice-shop](https://selfhost.directory/project/juice-shop) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/juice-shop.md)
- [mitmproxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/juice-shop-vs-mitmproxy