JUGNU MUSICvslivekit
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| JUGNU MUSIC | livekit | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #21 of 59 in Music Streaming | #2 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 277 | 21 897 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +822 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 19 |
| Latest release | — | v1.13.11 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
livekit scores 80/100 against 50/100 for JUGNU MUSIC, so it is the safer default.
livekit ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for JUGNU MUSIC.
If you want the quickest setup, JUGNU MUSIC is easier to run; livekit needs more configuration.
livekit is growing faster right now (+822 stars in 30 days).
JUGNU MUSIC details →livekit details →
Swap a project
Keep JUGNU MUSIC, compare it with
Keep livekit, compare it with