# Joplin vs youtube-dl

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Joplin | youtube-dl |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 81 in Notes & Editors | #6 of 12 in Video |
| GitHub stars | 56 920 ✓ | 402 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +440 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.7.22 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Joplin scores 83/100 against 51/100 for youtube-dl, so it is the safer default.

Joplin ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for youtube-dl.

If you want the quickest setup, youtube-dl is easier to run; Joplin needs more configuration.

Joplin is growing faster right now (+440 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Joplin](https://selfhost.directory/project/joplin) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/joplin.md)
- [youtube-dl](https://selfhost.directory/project/youtube-dl) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/youtube-dl.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/joplin-vs-youtube-dl