# Joplin vs tunesynctool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Joplin | tunesynctool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 81 in Notes & Editors | #43 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 56 922 ✓ | 158 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +442 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v3.7.22 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.2.2 · 6 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Joplin scores 83/100 against 41/100 for tunesynctool, so it is the safer default.

Joplin ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for tunesynctool.

If you want the quickest setup, Joplin is easier to run; tunesynctool needs more configuration.

Joplin is growing faster right now (+442 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Joplin](https://selfhost.directory/project/joplin) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/joplin.md)
- [tunesynctool](https://selfhost.directory/project/tunesynctool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tunesynctool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/joplin-vs-tunesynctool