# Joplin vs Tube Archivist

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Joplin | Tube Archivist |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 81 in Notes & Editors | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 56 922 ✓ | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +442 ✓ | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v3.7.22 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Joplin scores 83/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.

Joplin ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.

If you want the quickest setup, Joplin is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.

Joplin is growing faster right now (+442 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Joplin](https://selfhost.directory/project/joplin) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/joplin.md)
- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/joplin-vs-tube-archivist