# Joomla! vs Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Joomla! | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 42 in Content Management | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 5 157 ✓ | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +14 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | 6.2.0 · 12 Oct 2026 | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | PHP | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Joomla! scores 74/100 against 64/100 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, so it is the safer default.

Joomla! ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes.

If you want the quickest setup, Joomla! is easier to run; Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes needs more configuration.

Joomla! is growing faster right now (+14 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Joomla!](https://selfhost.directory/project/joomla) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/joomla.md)
- [Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes](https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/joomla-vs-zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s