# Joomla! vs Nonograph

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Joomla! | Nonograph |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 42 in Content Management | #14 of 24 in Blogging |
| GitHub stars | 5 157 ✓ | 324 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +14 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | 6.2.0 · 12 Oct 2026 | v0.5.1 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Unlicense |
| Main language | PHP | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Joomla! scores 74/100 against 47/100 for Nonograph, so it is the safer default.

Joomla! ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Nonograph.

Joomla! is growing faster right now (+14 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Joomla!](https://selfhost.directory/project/joomla) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/joomla.md)
- [Nonograph](https://selfhost.directory/project/nonograph) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nonograph.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/joomla-vs-nonograph