# JmalCloud vs SeaweedFS

> Two self-hosted [Cloud Storage projects](https://selfhost.directory/cloud-storage), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | JmalCloud | SeaweedFS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 11 in Cloud Storage | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 881 | 35 794 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +869 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 28 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.16.9 · 4 Aug 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 48/100 for JmalCloud, so it is the safer default.

SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for JmalCloud.

If you want the quickest setup, JmalCloud is easier to run; SeaweedFS needs more configuration.

SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+869 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [JmalCloud](https://selfhost.directory/project/jmal-cloud-view) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/jmal-cloud-view.md)
- [SeaweedFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/jmal-cloud-view-vs-seaweedfs