# JmalCloud vs Pi-hole

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | JmalCloud | Pi-hole |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 11 in Cloud Storage | #1 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 882 | 61 544 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +482 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v2.16.9 · 4 Aug 2026 | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 48/100 for JmalCloud, so it is the safer default.

JmalCloud ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Pi-hole.

If you want the quickest setup, JmalCloud is easier to run; Pi-hole needs more configuration.

Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+482 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [JmalCloud](https://selfhost.directory/project/jmal-cloud-view) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/jmal-cloud-view.md)
- [Pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/jmal-cloud-view-vs-pi-hole