# JmalCloud vs OmniVoice-Studio

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | JmalCloud | OmniVoice-Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 94/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 11 in Cloud Storage | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 882 | 93 681 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +58 407 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 35 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.16.9 · 4 Aug 2026 | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 48/100 for JmalCloud, so it is the safer default.

OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for JmalCloud.

If you want the quickest setup, JmalCloud is easier to run; OmniVoice-Studio needs more configuration.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+58 407 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [JmalCloud](https://selfhost.directory/project/jmal-cloud-view) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/jmal-cloud-view.md)
- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/jmal-cloud-view-vs-omnivoice-studio