# JmalCloud vs llama.cpp

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | JmalCloud | llama.cpp |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 11 in Cloud Storage | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 882 | 132 689 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +3 234 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 1464 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.16.9 · 4 Aug 2026 | b11978 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 48/100 for JmalCloud, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1464 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for JmalCloud.

If you want the quickest setup, JmalCloud is easier to run; llama.cpp needs more configuration.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 234 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [JmalCloud](https://selfhost.directory/project/jmal-cloud-view) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/jmal-cloud-view.md)
- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/jmal-cloud-view-vs-llamacpp