# JmalCloud vs Kokoro FastAPI

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | JmalCloud | Kokoro FastAPI |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 69/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 11 in Cloud Storage | #4 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 882 | 5 612 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +135 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 14 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.16.9 · 4 Aug 2026 | v0.9.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Kokoro FastAPI scores 69/100 against 48/100 for JmalCloud, so it is the safer default.

Kokoro FastAPI ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for JmalCloud.

Kokoro FastAPI is growing faster right now (+135 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [JmalCloud](https://selfhost.directory/project/jmal-cloud-view) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/jmal-cloud-view.md)
- [Kokoro FastAPI](https://selfhost.directory/project/kokoro-fastapi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kokoro-fastapi.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/jmal-cloud-view-vs-kokoro-fastapi