# JmalCloud vs llama.cpp

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | JmalCloud | llama.cpp |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 15 in File Storage | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 411 | 132 714 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +3 259 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 1467 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.16.9 · 4 Aug 2026 | b11981 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Java | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 50/100 for JmalCloud, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1467 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for JmalCloud.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 259 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [JmalCloud](https://selfhost.directory/project/jmal-cloud-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/jmal-cloud-server.md)
- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/jmal-cloud-server-vs-llamacpp