# JmalCloud vs juicefs

> Two self-hosted [File Storage projects](https://selfhost.directory/file-storage), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | JmalCloud | juicefs |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 15 in File Storage | #1 of 15 in File Storage |
| GitHub stars | 410 | 14 585 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +123 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.16.9 · 4 Aug 2026 | v1.4.2 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

juicefs scores 73/100 against 50/100 for JmalCloud, so it is the safer default.

juicefs ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for JmalCloud.

juicefs is growing faster right now (+123 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [JmalCloud](https://selfhost.directory/project/jmal-cloud-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/jmal-cloud-server.md)
- [juicefs](https://selfhost.directory/project/juicefs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/juicefs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/jmal-cloud-server-vs-juicefs