# jitsu vs WBO

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | jitsu | WBO |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Customer Data Platform | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 5 121 ✓ | 2 675 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +31 ✓ | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 4 ✓ |
| Latest release | jitsu-cli1.11.0 · 9 Jul 2026 | v2.18.26 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

jitsu scores 63/100 against 61/100 for WBO, so it is the safer default.

WBO ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for jitsu.

If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; jitsu needs more configuration.

## Details

- [jitsu](https://selfhost.directory/project/jitsu) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/jitsu.md)
- [WBO](https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/jitsu-vs-wbo