# jitsu vs Tube Archivist

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | jitsu | Tube Archivist |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 72/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Customer Data Platform | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 5 121 | 8 552 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +31 | +83 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 6 ✓ |
| Latest release | jitsu-cli1.11.0 · 9 Jul 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 63/100 for jitsu, so it is the safer default.

Tube Archivist ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for jitsu.

Tube Archivist is growing faster right now (+83 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [jitsu](https://selfhost.directory/project/jitsu) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/jitsu.md)
- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/jitsu-vs-tube-archivist