# jitsu vs Tasmota

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | jitsu | Tasmota |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 79/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Customer Data Platform | #3 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 5 121 | 24 940 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +31 | +167 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 6 ✓ |
| Latest release | jitsu-cli1.11.0 · 9 Jul 2026 | v16.0.0 · 16 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Tasmota scores 79/100 against 63/100 for jitsu, so it is the safer default.

Tasmota ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for jitsu.

Tasmota is growing faster right now (+167 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [jitsu](https://selfhost.directory/project/jitsu) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/jitsu.md)
- [Tasmota](https://selfhost.directory/project/tasmota) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tasmota.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/jitsu-vs-tasmota