# jitsu vs supabase

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | jitsu | supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 92/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Customer Data Platform | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 121 | 114 271 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +31 | +3 523 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 8 ✓ |
| Latest release | jitsu-cli1.11.0 · 9 Jul 2026 | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

supabase scores 92/100 against 63/100 for jitsu, so it is the safer default.

supabase ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for jitsu.

supabase is growing faster right now (+3 523 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [jitsu](https://selfhost.directory/project/jitsu) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/jitsu.md)
- [supabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/jitsu-vs-supabase