# jitsu vs Stirling-PDF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | jitsu | Stirling-PDF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Customer Data Platform | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 121 | 95 280 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +31 | +2 318 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 25 ✓ |
| Latest release | jitsu-cli1.11.0 · 9 Jul 2026 | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 63/100 for jitsu, so it is the safer default.

Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for jitsu.

If you want the quickest setup, Stirling-PDF is easier to run; jitsu needs more configuration.

Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 318 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [jitsu](https://selfhost.directory/project/jitsu) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/jitsu.md)
- [Stirling-PDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/jitsu-vs-stirling-pdf