# jitsu vs Sonarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | jitsu | Sonarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Customer Data Platform | #1 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 121 | 17 478 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +31 | +965 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 34 ✓ |
| Latest release | jitsu-cli1.11.0 · 9 Jul 2026 | v5.0.0.2838 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Sonarr scores 81/100 against 63/100 for jitsu, so it is the safer default.

Sonarr ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for jitsu.

If you want the quickest setup, Sonarr is easier to run; jitsu needs more configuration.

Sonarr is growing faster right now (+965 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [jitsu](https://selfhost.directory/project/jitsu) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/jitsu.md)
- [Sonarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/sonarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sonarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/jitsu-vs-sonarr